A campaign committee angling to put a minimum wage increase on next year’s Missouri ballot has received more than $500,000 from several nonprofit groups.
These contributions come amid a fierce debate over politically active nonprofits’ influence on elections. Such groups are not required to reveal their contributors or how they spend their money.
Raise Up Missouri was formed earlier this year to get a ballot initiative before voters raising Missouri’s minimum wage to $12 an hour by 2023. It’s a reaction of sorts to a new state law invalidating local minimum wage increases in both St. Louis and Kansas City, which piqued the attention of labor unions and activist groups from around the country.
Since late September, nonprofits known as 501(c)(4)s, The Fairness Project and the Sixteen Thirty Fund, and a 501(c)(3), the , have donated a combined $537,500 to Raise Up Missouri. A recently enacted constitutional amendment setting up contributions limits and other restrictions does not affect ballot initiatives.
These nonprofits’ money could be critical to getting the minimum wage measure on the ballot, since it often costs hundreds of thousands of dollars to gather the necessary signatures.
“Sixteen Thirty Fund and the projects it fiscally sponsors use a variety of tactics to advance various public policy goals, including supporting ballot measures,” said Sixteen Thirty Fund president Eric Kessler in an e-mail. “As a 501(c)(4) organization, Sixteen Thirty Fund is supported by a range of private donors who prefer to remain anonymous.”
Spokespeople for the National Employment Law Center and the Fairness Project did not return messages from St. Louis Public Radio. But the executive director of the Fairness Project, which was formed to pass minimum wage boosts across the country, told Oregon Public Radio last yearthat his group received initial funding from the labor union United Healthcare Workers in California.
Lew Prince, the treasurer of Raise Up Missouri, said business groups that will likely oppose the minimum wage initiative often don’t reveal their donors. He went onto say that “when you see the amount of outside money that comes into this state and that will be coming in, there is no way to run a political campaign with one hand behind your back.”
“If we spend our lives vetting organizations wanting to help us, we wouldn’t have time to do what we need to do — which is get over 100,000 signatures on petitions to get this thing on the ballot,” Prince said.
Raise Up Missouri has also received thousands of dollars from labor unions, including $25,000 from the St. Louis-based chapter of Laborers International Union of North America. It’s also taken in dozens of small donations from individuals.
“What I’m saying is, we can vet the direct contributor. But I think it’s really not fair to ask us to vet beyond that,” Prince said. “But more than that, if you take a look where the opposition’s money is coming from — it’s much darker. And you will find that you get none of this kind of information from them.”
Limits to transparency?
The nonprofits’ donations come amid increased scrutiny of how such groups get involved in Missouri politics.
Since Gov. Eric Greitens came into office earlier this year, both Republicans and Democrats have been critical of how his former staffers started a 501(c)(4) called A New Missouri to promote the GOP chief executive’s agenda. Like the groups that gave to Raise Up Missouri, A New Missouri doesn’t have to reveal its donors. That’s led some legislators to call for new laws requiring disclosure if these types of groups get involved in Missouri campaigns.
(A New Missouri has also contributed about $350,000 to a campaign committee opposing a statewide initiative to repeal the state's new "right to work" law.)
But those types of efforts have run into opposition, especially from conservativeswho contend that disclosure requirements are an affront to free speech.
And barring legislative action, it’s likely that nonprofits will be able to donate to political action committees and ballot initiatives without revealing their donors. A constitutional amendment known as Clean Missouri would require a "federal political action committee" to disclose contributors if it donates to a candidate, but not if those groups give to a PACor a ballot initiative.
Prince said there’s a difference between nonprofits that support candidates and those that support ballot initiatives.
“People need to be able to band together to push toward social change,” Prince said. “And it’s very different than commercial organizations or the wealthy doing the same thing. Because those folks alreakdy have a lot of power. They can call legislators and get appointments. The average citizen going to Jefferson City isn’t going to get past the door when their legislator’s busy. It’s just the way it is.”
Raise Up Missouri has until next May to turn in signatures to get on the 2018 ballot.
Follow Jason on Twitter: @jrosenbaum
Copyright 2020 St. Louis Public Radio. To see more, visit .
