Most Active Stories
- Historians Recommend The Best 20 Books About Kansas City
- Report: Medicaid Expansion In Missouri Would Yield Up to $100M In Annual Savings
- First-Ever National Coal Ash Regs Disappoint Missouri Environmentalists
- How The Kansas-Missouri State Line Became A Road
- School Closings In The Kansas City Metro For January 7
Tue September 4, 2012
Group Files Signatures To Remove Controversial Sculpture
A grand jury may decide the fate of a life-sized bronze sculpture at the Overland Park Arboretum and Botanical Gardens.
A group upset about an Overland Park sculpture says it has turned in 4,700 signatures - 1,000 more than needed - to compel a judge to convene a grand jury to investigate whether the work, "Accept and Reject," by sculptor Yu Chang, is obscene.
The statue depicts a headless, bare-breasted female figure pointing a camera at herself. The American Family Association of Kansas and Missouri contends that the statue promotes sexting in a venue where families take their children.
In May, Stilwell resident and mother, Joanne Hughes, started a campaign to have the statue removed, out of the sight of children. In a June article in the Kansas City Star, Hughes described why she decided to start an online petition:
Calls to Overland Park’s mayor, city manager, council members, arboretum officials and others gave her no satisfaction.
“Not one of the people I talked to saw anything inappropriate about having that in front of children,” Hughes said.
No plans to move the sculpture; no plans even to talk about moving the sculpture.
The Star also reported that, according to Johnson County District Attorney Stephen Howe: "proving something is 'obscene' from a legal standpoint is very difficult."
By statute, Howe said, something can be deemed “obscene” only if it is shown to lack any serious literary, educational, artistic or scientific value.
“In general, across the country, with obscenity cases,” Howe said, “there is a very high standard to meet. The courts have always weighed very strongly on the side of freedom of speech.”